Post by : Saif
Lawmakers in the Philippines are debating whether to move forward with impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., a decision that could mark a major moment in the country’s political history. The discussions are taking place in the House of Representatives, where a justice committee is reviewing the complaints.
Two separate impeachment complaints were filed by a lawyer and a group of activists. On Monday, the House justice committee said both complaints were acceptable in form, allowing the process to move to the next stage. On Tuesday, lawmakers met again to decide whether the complaints have enough substance to proceed further.
The accusations against President Marcos include betrayal of public trust, corruption, and violations of the constitution. One major issue raised in the complaints is Marcos’ decision to allow former President Rodrigo Duterte to be arrested and sent to The Hague. Duterte is facing trial at the International Criminal Court over thousands of deaths linked to his war on drugs.
The complaints also accuse Marcos of abusing his authority in the use of public funds. This includes a controversy involving flood-control projects that allegedly led to corruption. One complaint even claims Marcos is unfit to lead due to alleged drug use, which the president has firmly denied.
President Marcos has said he respects the impeachment process and insists he has done nothing wrong. His office stated that he did not violate any laws and did not commit any act that would justify impeachment. Marcos also continues to enjoy strong support in Congress, which is dominated by his political allies.
If the House justice committee decides the complaints have merit, the issue will be put to a vote in the full House of Representatives. To formally impeach the president, at least one-third of House members must vote in favor. If that happens, the case would move to the Senate for trial, where senators would act as jurors.
Only one Philippine president, Joseph Estrada, has previously been impeached. His trial in 2001 ended without a verdict after prosecutors walked out. In total, only one senior official in the country’s history has been fully convicted through impeachment.
The situation is further complicated by the political divide between President Marcos and Vice President Sara Duterte. She previously faced impeachment efforts that were dismissed by the Supreme Court and is now facing new complaints. She has also denied all allegations.
As lawmakers continue their review, the country watches closely. The outcome could shape the future of Philippine politics and test the strength of its democratic institutions.
#trending #latest #Philippines #Impeachment #FerdinandMarcosJr #PhilippinePolitics #Congress #RuleOfLaw #armustnews
Advances in Aerospace Technology and Commercial Aviation Recovery
Insights into breakthrough aerospace technologies and commercial aviation’s recovery amid 2025 chall
Defense Modernization and Strategic Spending Trends
Explore key trends in global defense modernization and strategic military spending shaping 2025 secu
Tens of Thousands Protest in Serbia on Anniversary of Deadly Roof Collapse
Tens of thousands in Novi Sad mark a year since a deadly station roof collapse that killed 16, prote
Canada PM Carney Apologizes to Trump Over Controversial Reagan Anti-Tariff Ad
Canadian PM Mark Carney apologized to President Trump over an Ontario anti-tariff ad quoting Reagan,
The ad that stirred a hornets nest, and made Canadian PM Carney say sorry to Trump
Canadian PM Mark Carney apologizes to US President Trump after a tariff-related ad causes diplomatic
Bengaluru-Mumbai Superfast Train Approved After 30-Year Wait
Railways approves new superfast train connecting Bengaluru and Mumbai, ending a 30-year demand, easi